EVO9 - FUTURE DIRECTIONS OF SEISMIC CODES
|
EVO9 - FUTURE DIRECTIONS OF SEISMIC CODES |
|
| MONDAY | ||||||||
| AMBER 2 | Convenors: D. Grant, K. Beyer, K. Haymes | ||||||||
| 14:30 - 14:32 | INTRODUCTION | |||||||
| 14:32 - 14:41 | FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN EUROCODE 8: 3RD GENERATION AND BEYOND D.N. Grant, K. Beyer, H. Degee, M. Follesa, M. Fox, M. Fragiacomo, S. Lu, M. Di Ludovico, T. Sullivan, G. Weatherill, W.Y. Kam | |||||||
| 14:41 - 14:50 | HUNDRED-YEAR HISTORY OF SEISMIC CODE IN JAPAN AND ITS FUTURE DEVELOPMENT Y. Ishiyama, H. Kato, R. Okamoto, T. Narafu, S. Kita, S. Mstsuzaki, S. Ikeda, J. Sakuma, T. Azuhata, K. Nishino | |||||||
| 14:50 - 14:59 | NAVIGATING SEISMIC HAZARD UPDATES AND PERFORMANCE TARGET CHANGES IN THE U.S. J. Hooper | |||||||
| 14:59 - 15:08 | CONTROLLING RISK IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF FUTURE SEISMIC DESIGN STANDARDS T. Sullivan, K. Elwood, A. Hulsey | |||||||
| 15:08 - 15:17 | SEISMIC DESIGN AS PART OF A LARGER SCHEME P. Franchin | |||||||
| 15:17 - 15:26 | 30 YEARS OF DIRECT DISPLACEMENT-BASED DESIGN: WHERE WE STARTED, WHAT'S BEEN DONE, WHERE WE'RE GOING M. Kowalsky, A. Palma Parra | |||||||
| 15:26 - 15:35 | FORESEEING FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL BUILDING CODES IN SEISMIC REGIONS A.A. Correia | |||||||
| 15:35 - 15:45 | DISCUSSION | |||||||
| TUESDAY | ||||||||
| MONITOR 8 | Convenors: D. Grant, K. Beyer, K. Haymes | ||||||||
| 09:00 - 09:05 | INTRODUCTION | |||||||
| 09:05 - 09:13 | NONLINEAR ANALYSIS FOR SEISMIC DESIGN IN THE US: DESIGN GUIDELINES, CHALLENGES, FUTURE DIRECTIONS S. Gavridou, J. Wallace | |||||||
| 09:13 - 09:21 | HAZARD AND CAPACITY CONTROLLED PERFORMANCE TARGETS FOR THE SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING BUILDINGS S. Arslantürkoglu, B. Stojadinovic | |||||||
| 09:21 - 09:29 | EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN OF STRUCTURES IN NEAR-FAULT REGIONS R. Goswami, A. Goyal, V. Chaturvedi, T. Chandra, P. Bansode, D.K. Jaiswal, C.V.R. Murty | |||||||
| 09:29 - 09:37 | SEISMIC CODE PROVISIONS FOR POST-DISASTER BUILDINGS IN CANADA, USA, AND NEW ZEALAND: A COMPARISON M. Baradaran Shoraka, E. Dezhdar, J. Hooper | |||||||
| 09:37 - 09:45 | EXAMINATION OF DIRECTIONALITY IN THE MW 6.4, FERNDALE, CALIFORNIA EARTHQUAKE N. Girmay, E. Miranda, A. Poulos | |||||||
| 09:45 - 09:53 | PREDICTIONS AND SOCIETAL EXPECTATIONS OF DAMAGE TO EXISTING BUILDINGS IN EARTHQUAKES IN NEW ZEALAND C. Miranda, C. Toma, M. Stephens, J. Becker | |||||||
| 09:53 - 10:01 | EXPECTED MATERIAL PROPERTIES AND OVERSTRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE COLUMNS Q. Zhang, M.S. Alam, A. Ahmadnia, J. Jiang | |||||||
| 10:01 - 10:09 | EFFICACY OF PRESENT DESIGN CODES FOR ENSURING STRONG-COLUMN-WEAK-BEAM DESIGN OF RC BUILDINGS. S.K. Sarma, H.B. Kaushik | |||||||
| 10:09 - 10:17 | K QUOTIENT (KQ) METHOD FOR EFFICIENT COMPARISON OF INTER-CODE LATERAL FORCE LEVELS Z. Milutinovic, R. Salic Makreska, D. Tomic, J. Trajcevski | |||||||
| FRIDAY | ||||||||
| SUITE 9 | Convenors: D. Grant, K. Beyer, K. Haymes | ||||||||
| 09:00 - 09:02 | INTRODUCTION | |||||||
| 09:02 - 09:11 | EFFECTIVE SITE COEFFICIENTS FOR THE 2024 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) S. Rezaeian, N. Luco, A.J. Makdisi, H. Mason | |||||||
| 09:11 - 09:20 | A FRAMEWORK FOR INCORPORATING FATALITY RISK IN SEISMIC ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY IN NEW ZEALAND F. Zaidi, K. Elwood, A. Hulsey | |||||||
| 09:20 - 09:29 | GROUND MOTION DIRECTIONALITY AND BIDIRECTIONAL RESPONSE IN SEISMIC BRIDGE DESIGN A. Palma Parra, M. Kowalsky | |||||||
| 09:29 - 09:38 | A MULTI-OBJECTIVE APPROACH TOWARDS SEISMIC DESIGN OF NEXT-GENERATION CONCRETE STRUCTURES E. Opabola | |||||||
| 09:38 - 09:47 | ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVE SEISMIC DESIGN PROVISIONS FOR DIAPHRAGMS PER ASCE/SEI 7-22 C.F. Mayorga, G. Tsampras | |||||||
| 09:47 - 09:56 | TWO-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM SURROGATE MODEL FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN A. Horta Alvares da Silva, B. Stojadinovic | |||||||
| 09:56 - 10:05 | CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE CAPACITY DESIGN PROCEDURES OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES F. Crisafulli, G. Torrisi, E. Quiroga | |||||||
| 10:05 - 10:15 | DISCUSSION | |||||||
