SHR10 - TOWARD THE DEFINITION OF TRANS-REGIONAL SEISMIC VULNERABILITY MODELS |
FRIDAY | ||||||||
AMBER 5 | Convenors: C. Del Gaudio, S.-Q. Li, D. Gautam | ||||||||
09:00 - 09:03 | INTRODUCTION | |||||||
09:03 - 09:15 | A HEURISTIC MODEL FOR ITALIAN BUILDINGS DRIVEN BY A GENERALIZATION OF DAMAGE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS C. Del Gaudio, G.M. Verderame | |||||||
09:15 - 09:27 | A MULTI-HAZARD MODEL FOR THE CITY OF LISBON, PORTUGAL G. Mascheri, N. Chieffo, C. Arrighi, C. Del Gaudio, S. Li, P. Lourenço | |||||||
09:27 - 09:39 | TRANS-REGIONAL SEISMIC VULNERABILITY MODELS FOR THE HINDU-KUSH-HIMALAYA: TALES AND TRAITS D. Gautam, R. Rupakhety | |||||||
09:39 - 09:51 | CAN RECONNAISANCE MISSIONS PRODUCE RELIABLE FRAGILITY CURVES?: DATA FROM 2011 JAPAN EARTHQUAKE I. Ioannou, S. Bertelli, S. Ohno, A. Shibayama, A. Suppasri, T. Rossetto | |||||||
09:51 - 10:03 | DERIVATION OF FRAGILITY MODELS FOR URM BUILDINGS USING DAMAGE DATA FROM THE 2012 EMILIA EARTHQUAKES C. Monteferrante, G. Salamida, N. Buratti | |||||||
10:03 - 10:15 | TYPOLOGICAL SEISMIC RISK MAPS BASED ON MASONRY BUILDINGS DAMAGED AFTER L'AQUILA 2009 EARTHQUAKE M. Tatangelo, L. Audisio, M. D Amato, R. Gigliotti | |||||||
MONITOR 21 | Convenors: C. Del Gaudio, S.-Q. Li, D. Gautam | ||||||||
10:30 - 10:42 | CORRELATION BETWEEN SEISMIC PARAMETERS AND STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IN THE MW 5.8 CHANGNING EARTHQUAKE J. Hu, H. Zhang | |||||||
10:42 - 10:54 | DEVELOPMENT OF A SEISMIC ASSESSMENT TOOL MODERN REINFORCED MASONRY IN COSTA RICA B. González Rodrigo, L. Navas-Sánchez, F. Ferretti, C. Monteferrante, G. Alemán, S. Torres-Olivares, M. Savoia | |||||||
10:54 - 11:06 | TYPOLOGICAL LOSSES ASSESSMENT FROM OBSERVED SEISMIC DAMAGE OF EXISTING ITALIAN RC BUILDINGS L. Audisio, M. Tatangelo, M. D Amato, R. Gigliotti | |||||||
11:06 - 11:18 | DEVELOPMENT OF FRAGILITY CURVES AND VULNERABILITY MAPS IN MEXICO CITY A. Gomez Bernal, A. Romeo Peña, E. Arellano Mendez, H. Juarez Garcia | |||||||
11:18 - 11:30 | EFFECTIVENESS OF CUMULATIVE DAMAGE INDICES FOR SEISMIC LOSS ASSESSMENT M. Nagarajan, M. Raghunandan | |||||||
11:30 - 11:42 | EMPIRICAL FRAGILITY CURVES FOR DIFFERENT TYPES OF HOUSES, USING DIFFERENT INTENSITY MEASURE T. Cabrera, M. Hube, H. Santa María | |||||||
11:42 - 11:45 | DISCUSSION | |||||||
MONITOR 22 | Convenors: C. Del Gaudio, S.-Q. Li, D. Gautam | ||||||||
10:30 - 10:42 | EMPIRICAL VULNERABILITY MODEL AND SCENARIO-BASED RISK MAPS FOR THE REYKJAVIK CAPITAL AREA B. Bessason, R. Rupakhety, J.Ö. Bjarnason | |||||||
10:42 - 10:54 | FRAGILITY CIRVES: A CASE STUDY FOR THE ITALIAN SCHOOL MASONRY BUILDING STOCK N. Gattesco, I. Boem, E. Rizzi | |||||||
10:54 - 11:06 | DEFINITION OF REGION SENSITIVE FRAGILITY CURVES FOR EXISTING PRE CODE UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS K. Milkova, E. Dumova-Jovanoska | |||||||
11:06 - 11:18 | SEISMIC FRAGILITY CURVES BASED ON SIMPLIFIED METHODS: THE CASE OF SPANISH MASONRY BUILDINGS L. Navas-Sánchez, F. Ferretti, R. Romero-Jarén, M. Savoia, J. Cervera Bravo | |||||||
11:18 - 11:30 | SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF PILE-SUPPORTED WHARF CONSIDERING LOWER AND UPPER-BOUND SOIL PARAMETERS A. Aryanto, E. Wiguna, I.D. Sidi | |||||||
11:30 - 11:42 | STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC DAMAGE OBSERVED IN HISTORIC MASONRY BELL TOWERS F. Testa, A. Barontini, N. Chieffo, P.B. Lourenco | |||||||
11:42 - 11:45 | DISCUSSION |